data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3c0e2/3c0e2738b7b8750a6a0a41e05a8d56b374987b6f" alt=""
So why am I persevering with it?
The sapwood layer is lovely, thin and even. I haven't had to work it down at all and there are no knots. It's also a challenge and a good illustration of some of the problems.
It's difficult to show the twists and dips in a stave without a decent photographic studio and plenty of time on your hands. If you look back at some of the previous posts of this bow you'll see how awfull it looks.
It draws back ok, but the prob's are how to get a vaguely even tiller and how to get a good string line. As well as twist, the bow is trying to go slightly sideways.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bcc3b/bcc3b3919057b8650ce5e3f3e59a74bcc35c27d6" alt=""
This helps to see the overall bend and to ignore the dips. Viewed from the other side I couldn't actually draw a straight line along the limb, it was just too wobbly.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a863b/a863b59910a054db6785f885e811e6272848acc2" alt=""
Now I daresay this bow will end up still looking ugly, but if itn look balanced and shoot well, that's fine by me.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6c570/6c570263198fa9d8cb57f302b217f88ab6ced153" alt=""
Consider a straight length of wire, say a piece of wire coat hanger.
If you try and push the two ends toward each other it's fairly rigid.
If you now bend a large but fairly gentle U bend in the middle (taking care not to work harden the wire) so that the ends still run in line but it has the U bend in the middle and repeat the test of pushing the ends towards each other it will now flex at the U bend.
So that bend has changed the geometry of how the forces act along the limb, similarly when the limb is bent. Obviously small dips and waggles don't make much difference but it's just something to be aware of... if it looks weaker... maybe it really is? Maybe it's just the dip? That's part of the joy, you could probably throw a vast amount of analysis and computer time at it and be no closer to the real answer, it's about feel, experience and of course some luck. Become your own expert and beware of those who pontificate from their armchair having never made a bow themselves.
Talking of which:-
I had the big bow brought over to look at, as the back had developed some unsightly streaks. Was it due to being shot in the rain? Were they potential cracks as suggested by an armchair expert? I was slightly concerned until the bow came out of it's bag. John had correctly thought it was probably just the remnants of the cambium and indeed he was right.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2d41c/2d41c48949a7cde38073b72e8629f3ab04975e6c" alt=""
Quite right too.
Update:-
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/491bc/491bcd2ed31e19afa2add63eb70beb1ae6ab06d1" alt=""
This shows why I leave the bow a fairly square cross section until quite late in the process if twisting is an issue.
You can effectively shape the cross section to suit how the bow has turned out.
In one pic you can see how I'm resting the rasp on the side of the bow as it was originally rouhed out and the handle of the rasp is high and not at all in line with the string. The next pic shows how I can just re shape that side face to line up with the string so the arrow will have a smooth passage round the side of the bow minimising the paradox.
the other pic shows how the string line is begining to look respectable.
No comments:
Post a Comment